The Director General, National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), Kashifu Inuwa has called on the global tech community to put measures in place that would ensure that Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are built according to policies, regulations, and laws.
Inuwa’s call was contained in a statement by the Agency’s spokesperson, Hajiya Hadiza Umar on Thursday in Abuja.
The DG who joined world-leading tech experts at the Global Artificial Intelligence (AI) Summit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on a plenary session with the theme, “Catalyzing AI Communities and Solutions: Sharing Cases Across the EU, Latin America, Asia, and Africa”, stated that getting people in the community to be part of building AI systems was very important.
He said, if few techy people are allowed to develop AI systems, they would build the systems with a techy mindset, while the systems are used in so many ways such as criminal justice, recruitment, profiling, etc. So software engineers that build AI are beyond just software engineers; they are also social engineers.
Inuwa emphasized that the government needs to make sure that there are Ethics, Codes, and Standard for anybody designing any system that would make decisions on behalf of the government or that will make decisions that the community must follow.
He further stated that “the way it is today, we obey most of the rules of these technologies than the rules of our country. Before you use any system or access any place controlled by the technology, you have to agree to follow the rules of the technology.”
“We need to stop looking at technology from either consumer’s perspective in terms of where he buys and costs or a capitalist’s in terms of how to exploit or build products around it. We need to start looking at it from the citizen’s eyes, how it changes the way we live together, and how it can be used for the public good. This can only be achieved through policies, regulations, and laws, which we believe has to be co-created.”
“We are not encouraging the government to use armchair theory to come up with laws or regulations. But we are saying that the government should co-create it with the ecosystem because the technology is new and evolving. You cannot regulate what you don’t know. Regulation is synonymous with putting a traffic light in a traffic place, and you need to understand the traffic patterns before putting the traffic light,” he added.
Inuwa further informed that to make the digital space safer for everyone, including children, Nigeria came up with a Code of Practice for Interactive Computer Service Platforms/Internet Intermediaries.
He said, what the government was trying to achieve with the Code was to ensure that what was illegal offline, was illegal online, adding that the action plan was to move Nigeria’s legal laws to the digital space.
He said, Initial, cyberspace was seen as an ungoverned space, but now everyone agrees that regulation was needed. He however, said, the right regulation needs to evolve and created.
The DG also highlighted the need to ensure that unaccountable power doesn’t reside and be exercised by anyone.
He gave an example of how big tech companies are more powerful than some sovereign nations due to the data and information in their possession.”
“The government is saying to the big techcompanies/platforms, we want you to be accountable and enhance competition.
Most of the laws and regulations around the world are talking about anti-competition and anti-trust laws, the need for increased accountability, or safeguarding privacy. This is because big techcompanies, in what is referred to as surveillance capitalism, take a lot of data and information about their users to improve products and services. Thisbehavioral surplus data is used to manipulate and control people without their knowledge through what is called instrumentarian power.
“The government wants these companies to be accountable, more open, and transparent in what they do without dominating the market”, he said.
He added that, due to the domination factor that plays out in the tech space, some big techs always try to acquire anyone doing something in their niche. So, to avoid that, we need a level playing field where we can allow local start-ups to grow.
Furthermore, the DG stated that the government was looking at technology beyond just a tool but as something that could be used for governance transformation.
He added that, “we are not saying the government should have total control over the technology that can lead to authoritarian regime or dictators with full power to do whatever they want. Rather, we should use it to protect our democracy.
“We used to say these tools are improving democracy and increasing freedom of speech, but today, we realized that they are actually eroding democracy and diminishing freedom. So how can we hold them accountable? How can we use the community to create the laws.
“We know we have self-regulation. It is not enough because the self-regulation is mostly built in another jurisdiction, and with the way AI is evolving, we are at a narrow intelligence stage, but by the time it reaches the super intelligent stage, we cannot control it anymore, because we don’t know what it is going to be. We always talk about the promising potential and mostly keep silent about the deadly risk of these technologies,” the DG said.